Proud of our graduates

Yesterday, my school had its Quarterly Meeting for the Second Quarter. Although we have lots of Seniors who will be graduating this year, there were 5 that were mentioned specifically at the meeting — one of which, I had worked with in the past, and was glag to hear her story told.

Since we are an online school with asynchronous courses, we have a lot of talented students who need to be able to “do school” at times it is convenient for them. Athletes and actors are two groups that readily come to mind. Although we don’t list the names of ours students (to protect their privacy), that doesn’t stop some from sharing it themselves.

On the other side of the spectrum, though, are students who struggle in a brick school. For them, our online, asynchronous model makes it possible for them to do school at all, let alone succeed in school. The student I mentioned from the first paragraph came from this group. To protect privacy, I will just refer to her as, “B.”

B has serious vision processing issues. Although I don’t know her full story, I can only imagine the difficulty she would have in a brick school trying to see, and then comprehend, any written learning material presented while there are 29 other kids in the room who are finishing the assignment as she is just finishing reading the directions.

I got involved with the family right before she started her Senior year. Mom reached out to me to discuss options for B to take a 4th year of math her final year of high school. One of the courses that we offered looked like it would be a good fit for her, only the book was changing so the course was not available until all the changes were made and processed.

Since the course wasn’t ready when B wanted to start, she ended up starting the year taking Pre-Calculus. A few weeks in, though, we did have the other course ready. She had to option to stop Pre-Calculus and move to take all of Advanced Applied Mathematics (AAM), essentially doing a few weeks of Pre-Calculus work for nothing, finish the first semester of Pre-Calculus and then switch to the first semester of AAM to finish her year, or stay in Pre-Calculus for the full year.

B decided to switch to AAM immediately and ultimately was glad she did, even though she had to do extra work. Fortunately for me, we have a teacher at our school who also has visual processing issues (he is legally blind); we paired the two of them up for her senior year since they already had something in common.

(You may ask how a blind teacher can work at an online school, especially in math where screen readers don’t yet have the capacity to read math symbols drawn by hand. Sounds like an idea for another post!)

B will be graduating with us in a few month, which is exciting. At our meeting yesterday, though, I learned that she was accepted into her first choice of college! Here is a young lady who desires to succeed despite her obstacles.

We all have obstacles of varying degrees. What are you doing to overcome yours?


Common Errors Made by Maths Teachers

Recently, I read a blogpost of the same title as this one. The first error she posted was the same as the image for this post, and it reminded me of a conversation I had with a parent a few years ago.

As mentioned before, I teach in an online school. Our courses are designed to be asynchronous, so our students can work at any pace they want. As a result, the content is pre-designed (often by a third party) and there are limits to changes we can make.

Many times, this boils down to preferences. If there is a topic, I might want to teach it one way, but the course teaches it a different way. It isn’t wrong, per se. It just isn’t what I would use. For example, I don’t like the use of the word “cancel” in math because I think students use it too often when they don’t really know what is going on (or why they can do what they are doing). Think of it as “magic.” If I say the word “cancel,” I can do anything I want! (At least Jane Taylor agrees with me in her comment on the same post mentioned above.)

Using the word “cancel,” though is more a preference than an error (although it can be used erroneously). As a result, even though I don’t like it, I cannot request to have it changed in the course. Only errors will get changed.

So in one of the courses I taught, the curriculum used the error listed above. They would say something like √9 = ±3. I know this is wrong, so I asked for it to be corrected. It ended up not being corrected as the curriculum writers saw this as a “preference” as opposed to an “error.”

Eventually a parent called me on it. Of course, I knew he was correct, but there wasn’t anything more I could do about the content. I did let the parent know that I give students credit if they gave the answers of √9 = ±3 or √9 = 3. Unfortunately, that wasn’t good enough for the parent, so we had several conversations through email and phone. What bothered me the most is that I could not do anything about their valid concern. At least not while their student was in the course.

On a positive note, we ended up rewriting the course shortly after that, but mainly because it was an old course. As an old course, we had many, many students go though it and learn it the wrong way. My hope is that they were able to correct their thinking in later courses.

Often when working with a student on radicals, I will give them the following scenario:

If I, as the teacher or as the author of the curriculum, give you a square root symbol, then I will tell you whether I want the positive or negative version. For example, if you see √9, you know I want the positive version. If you see −√9, then you know I want the negative version.

However, if YOU as the student put the square root symbol, then you don’t know if I want the positive or negative version of the square root, so you need to give me both. In that case, a problem like x2 = 9 would need to have two solutions since it is the student applying the radical sign.


Happy AmeriCorps Week!

Video: Spread the Passion

Nearly two decades ago, I decided that I wanted to teach at the college level. In looking back at my college experience, I tried to find a common trait that my good professors had–the professors that really stood out and I would qualify as the best in terms of helping me learn and being understanding in the classroom.

With rare exception, there was a common trait: they had all taught high school at some point in their lives.

It was then that I decided I wanted to follow the same path. I wanted to teach at the high school level first before teaching college. As a result, I applied for, and was accepted into, the Teach For America program.

This week, we celebrate all branches of the AmeriCorps program, including Teach For America. Thanks to all the volunteers and those who serve who make our cummunities great.


Bicycle Generator

After logging out of my email, I saw an ad for a video that caught my eye. The video was for This bicycle generator can bring electricity to millions of people. Now I will tell you, that bike is cool! I am always looking for a way to keep in shape (sometimes more successfully than other times). I think this idea would be good for people with a New Year’s resolution to exercise more, especially if they cancel their power company.

But this post isn’t about the video directly. After watching the video, I did a search for “bicycle generator,” which brought me to the website. One of the members, notoriouslev, made the bike and posted a comment to help people try to determine the v-belt length needed for this project.

I think it is obvious that he is not a mathematician, but also obvious the he paid attention in school in math class. His explanation, I think, is perfect for the lay person. It gives some basic informaiton about why it works without getting too technical to scare people, and then gives the steps someone else would need to take to replicate his idea for their project. In his short reply, he references both the circumference of a circle and the Pythagorean Theorem.

Now if a student says, “when am I ever going to learn this,” I can point them to notoriouslev and say, “you might not, but he did!”

He starts by measuring the diameter of his rim to get 26 inches, and converts it to 13 inches as the radius.

Then he says, “The equation to get the circumference of the rim is 2 x pie x radius = 2 x 3.14 x 13 = 81.64″ around.” Although it is pi, not pie, I’ll give him a pass on this step. Alternately, he could have used πd and not had to convert the diameter to a radius.

I don’t know how these belts are measured or bought, but if he is able to get an accuracy of hundredths of an inch, he may want to use a more accurate number for pi. I got 81.68 inches.

Once he has this number, he says to, “Subtract 1/4 of the circumference: 81.64 * 75% = 61.23” I think this is classic! He says to subtract, but then he multiplies instead! Mathematically, it is correct, though. If we take the circumference and subtract 1/4 of the circumference, we can rewrite that as:

C – ¼C = C(1 – ¼) = C•¾ = C•0.75 = C•75%

In his last step, he said to, “Add the diameter: 61.23 + 26 = 87.23″ Long.” At first, I had to look at the diagram to see why he added the diameter. Once I looked, I saw that he was really adding two radaii, which is the same value as the diameter. Essentially, he created a circle with a square drawn on top. The square has a vertex at the center of the circle, and the square’s side length is the same as the radius of the circle. Two of the sides of the square are tangent to the circle.


He does have an optional step 4 listed which isn’t entirely accurate. He says to:

Optional Step 4: You can add extra length to the v belt in case you don’t want the generator sitting just below the rear wheel’s exterior. For instance to place the generator 1 foot behind the rear wheel, you add 12″ for the extra distance behind the wheel, and then you use the Pythagorean theorem to get the additional v belt required to reach back to the tire: (12 x 12) + (13 x 13) …then get the square root = 17.7″. So to place the generator 1 ft behind the rear wheel of this bike, we add 29.7 inches to the 87.23″ we already had and get 116.93″


This model would assume (or imply) that there is some sort of pully at point D causing the belt to stay on the wheel rim all the way to point D before moving to the generator at point E. According to his description the side labeled d1 is 12 inches, the foot behind the read wheel. The side labeled e1 is 13 inches, the same as the radius of the wheel.

In actuallity, though, the belt will come off the wheel forming a tangent from the wheel to the generator at Point D.


For his purposes, though, using the hypotenuse might be close enough to get a belt length. In using the tangent line, the belt would leave the rim at point F, so even though the belt length from E to F is longer than the hypotenuse he calculated, the arclength from F to D is no longer traveled, so we lose some length from the circumference (less than 75% used now).

Using Geogebra, I found the measurement of the belt is 53.31 + 13 + 12 +25 = 103.31 inches.

Of note, since the segment BE is also a tangent, it will have the same length as EF (a much easier calculation than using Pythagorean). (Can you show why?)

If we bought a belt using his 116.93 inches calculation, I believe that the generator will be closer to 2 feet behind the back wheel. (About 20.19 inches behind the back wheel.)


What started as a signout video from my email turned into a neat little mathematical tangent. Thanks to notoriouslev for the comments that started this little journey.